
The problem may have been prevented if Nestle had first checked how
their suppliers produce the cocoa. Nonetheless, Nestle should buy the cocoa
from farmers at a higher price in exchange of child labor-free cocoa production.
I have two suggestions:
1. The company
may look for other suppliers of cocoa who do not use child labor in order to
pressure cocoa growers on Ivory Coast farms to stop child labor.
2. The company may
hire people to personally monitor what is happening in the field (for the
company use other suppliers of cocoa) and show it to the market.
The
Nestles use Teleological Framework, because they want to increase demand of
cocoa with cheap labor. So they use child labor to achieve the goal. The only
thing they care is outcome of the production. The first action I suggest The
Nestles do belongs to deontological framework, which focuses more on
duties or obligations. Child from cocoa industries should have the same
equality as us. The Nestles should find other suppliers of cocoa instead of
using child labor. The second action I suggest belongs to Virtue framework,
because this action can show the honesty of company. Consumers will be
happy to buy products from the Nestles.
Reference:
Revesz, R. (2016). Nestle is being sued for
allegedly using child slaves on cocoa farms. Independent. Retrieved from
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/nestle-is-being-sued-for-allegedly-using-child-slaves-on-cocoa-farms-a6806646.html
Salazar, H. (2015). Nestlé: Use of Child Labor
(2000-2015). Business Ethics Case Analyses. Retrieved from
http://businessethicscases.blogspot.com/2015/11/nestle-still-struggles-with-use-of.html